Law Offices of Anna R. Tseytlin, PLLC Law Offices of Anna R. Tseytlin, PLLC 2026-04-28T14:52:37Z https://www.tseytlinlaw.com/feed/atom/ WordPress /wp-content/uploads/sites/1603700/2022/06/cropped-Anna-R-site-icon-32x32.png On Behalf of Law Offices of Anna R. Tseytlin, PLLC <![CDATA[How “shared fault” affects compensation in a Washington accident]]> https://www.tseytlinlaw.com/?p=47823 2026-04-22T14:53:35Z 2026-04-28T14:52:37Z The law protects your recovery Unlike many other states, Washington does not bar you from seeking compensation even if an insurance company tries to assign you a percentage of blame. Here is how it works:
  • The “pure” rule: You can recover damages even if you are partially at fault. The rule simply reduces your total compensation by the percentage of your responsibility.
  • Driver responsibility: Drivers have a duty to stop for pedestrians in crosswalks. A driver’s admission of phone distraction is a massive legal factor that often outweighs their excuses about your visibility.
  • Fair calculation: If a jury were to find a driver 90% at fault and a pedestrian 10% at fault, the pedestrian would still receive 90% of their total damages. This includes coverage for medical bills, rehabilitation costs and home modifications.
By holding drivers accountable for their share of the fault, the law provides a pathway to secure the assistance you need.

Focusing on your recovery, not the blame

You should not have to defend your choice of clothing or the way you walk while recovering from a broken hip and concussion. An attorney’s job is to dismantle these “shared fault” tactics, keeping the focus on the driver’s negligence. By grounding your case in Washington’s protective statutes, you can move forward with the confidence that your future needs are accounted for. You have the right to be in that crosswalk, and you have the right to a recovery that reflects the true cost of your injuries.]]> On Behalf of Law Offices of Anna R. Tseytlin, PLLC <![CDATA[Bitten by a dog with no prior bites? You may still have a claim]]> https://www.tseytlinlaw.com/?p=47809 2026-02-26T02:45:27Z 2026-02-27T11:48:40Z Washington’s dog bite law protects victims Washington law usually holds the dog's owner responsible for bite injuries, even when the dog has never shown aggression before. The focus remains on what happened to the injured person, not on the dog’s history. This protection applies in many common situations, including:
  • Bites that happen in public places like parks, sidewalks or trails
  • Attacks while visiting someone’s home with permission
  • Attacks while making a delivery at someone’s home or business
  • Incidents where the dog was not properly restrained
  • Injuries that leave lasting physical or emotional effects
Dog owners sometimes argue that a victim provoked the dog, but that defense applies only in limited situations. Washington law requires proof of intentional provocation. When a person is lawfully present and does not intentionally provoke the dog, the owner remains responsible for the injuries. Understanding this rule helps victims push back against blame and misinformation. It also helps people avoid accepting unfair settlement offers.

Compensation a dog bite victim can seek

Dog bites can cause far more than visible wounds. Many victims require medical treatment over time and some face long-term effects that disrupt daily life. A successful claim may include compensation for medical expenses and lost income. It may also account for physical pain and emotional harm tied to the injury. In some cases, future treatment and scar revision also factor into the claim. Homeowner’s insurance frequently covers dog bite injuries, which means victims may not need to pursue the owner directly.

Protecting your rights after a dog bite

Dog bite cases move quickly. Evidence fades, medical records take time to collect and insurers may pressure victims to settle early. Washington law gives injured people strong legal protection, but timing and documentation still matter. You do not need to prove that a dog was dangerous to seek compensation. If a dog bite affected your daily life, speaking with an attorney can help you better understand your options on seeking compensation so you can focus on recovery.]]> On Behalf of Law Offices of Anna R. Tseytlin, PLLC <![CDATA[What you may overlook after a crash in Washington]]> https://www.tseytlinlaw.com/?p=47805 2026-01-22T10:32:42Z 2026-01-28T10:31:58Z Record gaps within official documentation Post-crash paperwork often provides summaries rather than full details. A collision report can leave out spacing, lane position or surface conditions. Medical intake notes may reflect only what you described during the first visit. Insurance records can rely on early wording given before the full picture forms. Reviewing each document soon after receipt helps you spot missing information while your recollection remains clear.

Health and cost developments over time

As normal activity resumes, physical and financial effects can change. Discomfort can increase with movement. Pain can shift to new areas. Repair work can also uncover damage not visible at first. These changes do not establish severity on their own, but they can affect how the crash receives later evaluation. Common post-crash changes include the following:
  • Symptoms observed during routine activity
  • Repair findings revealed after disassembly
  • Expenses incurred from transportation, treatment or missed income
Together, these factors can shape what information carries weight during later review.

Notice and deadline obligations under Washington rules

In Washington, certain timelines can start shortly after a collision. If an officer does not complete a report, different reporting duties can apply. When the crash involves injury or damage above the state threshold, you generally must submit a written collision report within four days. Insurance policies often expect notice within days, even when fault feels unclear. Medical billing and claim reviews may also rely on records created within the first few weeks after the crash. Missed dates can complicate later review. Tracking timing matters alongside saving records.

Items worth reviewing while details remain clear

In Washington, you generally have up to three years to consider a personal injury claim. Compensation often depends on evidence gathered much earlier. Useful records can include crash photos, repair invoices, medical visit notes, wage loss records and written insurer messages. Reviewing what you already have can help you decide whether the information supports further insurance review or possible compensation discussions.]]>